Well, the time has finally come for me to write my first post with the new WordPress editor! Hopefully, I’ll be able to contain me excitement!
Not too long ago, I finished this unit of French dragoons for the Franco-Prussian War (shown above – if you click here and it takes you to a page with a bit more info about them, it means I’ve worked out how to do the linking bits at least)!
Before I’d even started these dragoons though, I’d thought about also representing them fighting a dismounted action. In theory, dragoons were meant to operate as mounted infantry and dismount when they used firearms, but in the mid-19th century most dragoons fought as conventional shock-action cavalry. However, I’d read that some French dragoon units in 1870 did fight dismounted, so I thought it might be worth trying to represent them as such.
Although I couldn’t get Franco-Prussian War dismounted figures, Tumbling Dice Miniatures produce some 20mm scale WW1 dismounted cavalry, so I bought a handful of early war French dragoons. By 1914, the only real concession the French dragoons had made to their uniforms to make them less visible targets was to cover their brass helmets with drab light brown covers, so the WW1 figures looked fine for 1870 figures (see picture below, if my editing’s worked – otherwise I’ve no idea where the picture might be)!
Originally my plan was to just paint enough figures to replace some of the mounted figures in a unit to represent it fighting dismounted. In the end, I added some extra figures and spare standing horses to represent a dismounted unit in its own right. Finishing this unit doesn’t mean I’ve had a sudden blitz on painting either, since I started them way back before the mounted dragoons were finished! I painted the helmets brass with the leopard-skin band to represent 1870 figures, but otherwise the lack of red epaulettes is about the only fault with the uniform (although I’ve seen a period painting that shows that these weren’t always worn). Below you can see the original mounted unit with the dismounted unit in front of them (hopefully)!
I can also spread the dismounted figures across two units to represent them both fighting as dragoons rather than shock-action cavalry (see below).
Of course, since I hadn’t originally planned on doing a full dismounted dragoon unit, I don’t have enough unit movement bases to go round! C’est la vie!
As far as the new editor’s concerned, I didn’t really have a problem with the post itself, probably because I use simple formatting! However, adding in links to my previous posts was more difficult, since they used to just appear as a bulleted list and this time round I had to search for them. None of my tags appeared either, although I’m a bit slapdash about using them in the first place! I also found I had to edit any pictures before putting them into the post, whereas with the old editor I could do that anytime! I suppose if I’m not delivering a first class quality blog post in the first place, maintaining a relatively low standard of presentation should be within my capabilities!
great post John, looks like you will get along fine with it. Loving the models, they look really classy..
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks Steve, glad you like them! ๐ I’ve already managed to iron out a couple of the bugs I found editing!
LikeLiked by 2 people
do you need to get the url of the page you want to link to in your post, or is there a way of adding it as you type
LikeLiked by 3 people
I’ve since found that if you’re using the Classic editor block you can get a list of posts on your own blog, so you can just select from them. I’ve always found that the best way to add external links is to open a new window, go to the url you want, copy its address and then paste into the link box (but I’m not terribly efficient)!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thatโs been the way I normally do it. It also inflates the views of that page in your stats l
LikeLiked by 2 people
Haha! Win win! ๐
LikeLiked by 2 people
maybe because i still use the free one and i have a rolling blog the url is the same for whichever post is in that month it seems, will keep trying things..
LikeLiked by 2 people
Great work on your Dragoons John, having them dismounted is a whole other level of detail. All the blogging platforms seem to have had a shakeup, some bits seem to take more getting used to than others, personally I was happy with the old system as I now can’t edit a post at a later point, but that’s just me
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks Dave! ๐ I must admit, I quite like the dismounted figures!
I thought the old editor was quite straightforward – the new one seems to need a few more steps or doing things in a different order, but it’s had less effect on me so far than I thought it might! Bit of a pain for you if it makes it difficult to edit posts at a later point though!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Great stuff. They look very handsome on their movement trays.
Cheers,
Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks Pete! ๐ I did mean to take a photo of them off the tray, but forgot about it completely!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Alas! I have to start using it too? Oh, the pain!!
Nice lookimg dismounts BTW. The work you put in will look fantastic on the table.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks Harry! ๐ I’ve even considered trying to do the same for Prussian and Austrian dragoons if I can find suitable dismounted figures! Hope you don’t fine the new editor too onerous!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Well, I cant speak to the new editor as I’m still using the old one, but the figures look great and I always appreciate the little historical write-up. Crazy to think they were still wearing the same uniforms in 1914, but I guess that was very much the transition year from the old ways to moderns…
LikeLiked by 5 people
Thanks Azazel, glad you like them! ๐ French cuirassiers were also still wearing a cuirass in 1914 and had a drab cover for that as well as their helmets! They’d no doubt have been reluctant to change to the new editor as well! ๐
LikeLiked by 5 people
WWI had some …very interesting armour and uniform combinations. It’d certainly be an intriguing period to game in, if only I had the opponents!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, it could get tacked on to the bottom of the Future Projects list! ๐ Having said that, I haven’t done much on WW1 stuff in a long time (these don’t count) so it’s about time I worked back round to it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah the new editor, something to look forward to. I shall have to try and post later today. Love the figures mate.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks Thomo! ๐ I just set myself up a quick test post to try out and found the changes were probably minimal for me (I count that as lucky)!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not knowing the detail about the uniforms, I wouldnโt have know the difference between the models but I love that you explain the difference for us (you learn something new everyday. Iโm not sure when Iโll need to know about red epaulets on French period uniforms but Iโm sure it will shock someone when that titbit is delivered…). Great unit and having the dismounted models makes it almost a mini diorama. I really like the final picture and having the two units โmixed upโ.
Youโve definitely not sold me on the new editor so Iโm going to stick with the classic as long as I can.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Thanks mate! ๐ Sometime I think I write too much detail! ๐ Funnily enough, I didn’t find switching back to the new editor made much difference (except for adding links) but I only use a basic layout! You’ll be fine as long as you keep putting those nice pictures of your troops in for us!
LikeLiked by 3 people
As always John a nice but of history together with some great painted minis. Glad you have managed to get on with the new editor. One of the few things I remember from a training course I attended a great many years ago was KISS, keep it simple stupid, I would have faired better in my experience if I had remembered that! ๐
LikeLiked by 3 people
Haha, thanks Dave! ๐
LikeLiked by 2 people
I sacked it off John! Found a route to use the classic editor. Apparently WP are only supporting the old editor for another year but since there’s been millions of complaints, here’s wishful thinking that in a years time they’ll change their mind and keep the choice.
LikeLiked by 4 people
. . . or, in a year’s time, they’ll replace it with something “better”!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very cunning John !
Your dislike for painting horses is well documented and now you’ve found a way to have cavalry units on foot !!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Haha, you know me far too well Jim! ๐ Hope everything’s OK with you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are a brave man John, well done on venturing into the new world !!I was warned by Tech adviser not to do anything until the borders are opened and she is allowed to come back to visit us. I’m glad you did some of the lads performing their real role!
LikeLiked by 6 people
Thanks Pat! ๐ I thought you’d approve of me having some dismounted dragoons! I’m really pleased with them! Thought I might as well just get on with the new editor, although I haven’t got all that much lined up in the way of posts at the moment!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sorry that was supposed to be roll ! they are not actors are they Ha HA !
LikeLiked by 2 people
The linking-bit was the hardest for me ๐ The rest I acutally found quite useful.
I love the one holding the horse the most I think. Always enjoy your bases. I have recently come across pictures of 1870+ french dragoons, they look really different to everything before – mainly because of the lack of green as you said. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/4b/24/10/4b2410fd32804e5bc862c12be0467ecf.jpg
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks Anthony! ๐ I’d have like to put two horses onto one base as well, but they were just a bit too large for that! I think I’ve solved the links bit as well by reverting to the Classic editor for any blocks with links in them!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Might have looked a bit crowded. But you could still use a a bigger base as a unit filler or do it on a command base, where you put an officer model and a dragoon holding two horses maybe?
There is actually a link-function, but it isn’t a block itself – which is a bit of an unintuitive decission – simply mark and right-click the line where you want to add a link and there is a list with symbols (two half-circles with a minus) that creates a hyperlink. Other than that I also have not found a way to link to a specific past post, though.
LikeLiked by 3 people
The command base idea is a good one! ๐ I’ll keep that in mind!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Still, I wonder, is this (All Change!) a Genesis (Supper’s Ready) reference?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Funny thing, that was: I was looking through FPW-companies yesterday, and saw your painted Dragoons on Irregular Minis galary.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, you just never know where some people are going to turn up! ๐ I think they’ve also got a picture of my 20mm WW1 Ottoman cavalry. I’ve got ones and twos of Irregular figures scattered throughout my armies and I try and remember to send them a picture if I remember!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was the bases that tipped me off, btw. ๐ WW1 Ottoman cavalry, they sure make some “irregular” (obscure) minis.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lovely miniatures, John – I wouldn’t have noticed the epaulettes if you hadn’t pointed them out.
I’ve been using the new editor since it appeared. It would be okay, but they keep changing things and you can spend an age trying to figure out how to do something that took seconds before.
I’m sure someone out there is trying to make things harder for us, maybe they’re on piece-rate for every change they make!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks Justin! ๐ I think we’ll just have to muddle through!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great work and history write-up John. Having them available as dismounts would be useful but a lot of work – and worth it. Cheers!!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks Mark, glad you like them! ๐ Obviously, my arithmetic skills are pretty poor – not only have I painted six cavalry to start with, but I’ve then gone and painted another nine figures just ’cause I thought it was a good idea!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, you’ll make it even eventually John!
LikeLiked by 1 person
๐
LikeLike
Loving these mate. Has WordPress changed, the App seems the same to me???
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Steve! ๐ I can imagine you’ll always approve of me painting more cavalry, even if they are dismounted! The new WordPress editor seems to have been rolled out progressively, so it maybe hasn’t got to you yet! I’ve als found that depending on whether you’re using a phone, tablet or laptop, the appearance is different anyway!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sacre bleu! Those dragoons look great and I’m glad you found some minis that work well dismounted. I’m like you in that I found the new editor somewhat easy to get used to but I am not wild about how links work either (the symbol is not very obvious and something about it is harder than it should be too). I seem to get a bit better at the editor each time I use it so here’s to hoping we master it one day ๐
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Kuribo! ๐ I don’t know why, but this dismounted dragoon unit is one I’ve really enjoyed doing! And, as you say, we’ll no doubt all get better at the editor with time, at which point the next one will appear!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Really glad to hear they were as fun to make as they are to look at. Also, I’d have to agree that its all but inevitable that a new editor will be foisted upon us too soon! ๐
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can see why the French wanted to go to war in 1914 with the troops like this but with just a helmet cover – they look too good! Your painting as always does them justice too and these are some of my favourite figures of your armies.
I say you’ve mastered the Blocks function which – at the risk of alienating myself from the rest of the WordPress community – I rather like! ๐ If you’re unsure if something is going to look right when you publish, there’s always a ‘preview’ button top right of the page.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks Marvin, those are kind words indeed! ๐ I think this unit has got itself at the top of my favourites list, probably because it’s a slightly different!
Changes in things like the editor will affect everyone differently, so if you like it then that’s got to be a good thing for you! I must admit, I’m checking things more often with the “preview” command now, but that’s what it’s there for!
LikeLiked by 1 person
looking good – both the figures and the use of wordpress ๐ I have found the new editor ok to work with overall.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Mark! ๐ Nice to hear you’ve found the new editor OK!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very nice John and you’ve done well with the new editor. I’m managing ok with it but that’s not to say that I like it. Quite the opposite.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks IRO! ๐ I know you’ve had to put up with the new editor longer than me!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Itโs a bastard but we can adapt
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent brushwork as always; those leopard skins came out a treat (though I’m sure your Boxer tigermen had provided enough practice previously). I’m surprised Tumbling Dice is still around given their paucity on the internet. If I remember correctly, their figures are on the smaller side of 20mm?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Veroo! ๐ These were a lot easier to paint than the tigermen! You’re right about Tumbling Dice figures being on the smaller side, but they’re nice figures (I’ve also got some WW1 German, British and US gun crew). They make quite a large range of 1:600th aircraft and I’ve got some of them to go with my 1:600th/700th coastal forces ships.
LikeLike